The argument.
The ISWC-ISRC matching problem is the second-largest silent failure in the global royalty pipeline (after CWR errors). This paper quantifies the matching gap against our 207-million-track reference corpus, classifies the four most common root causes, and describes the resolution methodology.
What we are answering.
- What is the ISWC and how widely is it adopted - coverage of the global repertoire?
- Published research on ISWC-ISRC matching accuracy or failure rates?
- Documented root causes - missing ISWCs, multiple ISWCs per work, ISRC reuse, metadata inconsistency?
- Work by DDEX, CISAC, or academic researchers on identifier resolution?
- How does MusicBrainz approach work-to-recording matching - what does its data say about the scale?
- What do commercial databases (Gracenote, AllMusic, Luminate) claim about coverage?
How it will read.
Technical method paper. Quantitative and specific. Reads like a data-engineering post-mortem with commercial implications.
