Royalty Investigator public-source analysis 4 min read

Neighbouring rights pay out across borders, and payment depends on data

Current PPL, GVL and SENA figures show the scale of neighbouring-rights activity. Whether you get paid depends on coverage, mandates, eligibility and recording data.

Published by Music Intel · · Updated

The scale is visible

PPL reported £315.3 million in 2025 revenue, including £94 million from international activity, and said it paid more than 182,000 performers and recording rightsholders.[1]

GVL reported €257.927 million in 2025 collections, while SENA reported €86.9 million in gross payments to performers and producers.[2][3] These are differently defined measures and should not be compared as if they were identical.

The payment path is territorial

Recorded-music uses, eligibility rules and collection arrangements vary by country. A performer or recording rightsholder can appoint an organisation to collect internationally where reciprocal or bilateral arrangements exist. PPL explains that it identifies relevant uses, validates claims, pursues payment and allocates income under its international mandate.[4]

The data supplied matters. Performer line-ups, recording claims, ownership details and identifiers such as IPN help societies identify the correct recipient.

Coverage and mandates need checking

A team should not assume that one registration produces identical coverage everywhere. It should confirm which territories and uses the appointed organisation covers, whether the mandate is exclusive, and how local eligibility rules apply.

Direct registration in an additional territory is not automatically better. It may duplicate or conflict with an existing exclusive mandate. The correct route depends on the member agreement and the society relationship.

A practical catalogue check

  • Confirm every performer and recording rightsholder is registered with the chosen organisation.
  • Claim each recording and maintain complete performer line-ups.
  • Record the territories, uses and dates covered by each mandate.
  • Reconcile international statements against known airplay and eligible uses.
  • Query gaps with source records. Don't assume underpayment.

What the figures don't show

The current official sources demonstrate material cross-border activity and a data-dependent payment process. They do not establish that neighbouring rights are the most underclaimed income stream, that most UK performers are missing money, or a universal underclaim rate. Those questions require a defined catalogue sample and auditable claim data.

Sources

Primary and official sources.

  1. PPL delivers 4.75% year-on-year growth with annual revenue of £315.3 million
    PPL · official organisation · Accessed 10 August 2026
    Supports: PPL reports £315.3 million total revenue, £94 million international revenue and payments to more than 182,000 performers and recording rightsholders for 2025.
  2. GVL closes 2025 financial year with stable earnings performance
    GVL · official organisation · Published 11 June 2026 · Accessed 10 August 2026
    Supports: GVL reports €257.927 million in total collections, including broadcast, retransmission and public-performance revenue.
  3. Sena presenteert jaarcijfers 2025
    SENA · official organisation · Published 13 May 2026 · Accessed 10 August 2026
    Supports: SENA reports licence income and €86.9 million in gross payments to performers and producers for 2025.
  4. International royalties for performers
    PPL · official organisation · Accessed 10 August 2026
    Supports: PPL explains international mandates, recording claims, validation, IPN identifiers and differences in performer qualification between countries.
Read next

See Royalty Investigator

Royalty Investigator checks mandates, coverage and recording claims territory by territory, the practical catalogue check this piece sets out.