Royalty Investigator research brief 5 min read

Unauthorised uploads and recording identity abuse: what the public evidence establishes

Unauthorised uploads and malicious artist-profile attachments are documented. The public sources we reviewed don't show how often this happens, or that it diverts royalties.

Published by Music Intel · · Updated

What is documented

Unauthorised music uploads exist. Spotify provides a reporting route for rightsholders whose music has been uploaded without permission.[2] Spotify has also documented malicious releases being attached to the wrong artist profile, alongside accidental metadata mix-ups.[1]

Those are real identity and attribution risks. They justify monitoring and investigation.

What is not established

The public sources reviewed for this note do not establish that a duplicate upload, by itself, redirects royalties from the authorised owner. They do not establish the frequency of such events or a total loss figure. Spotify's re-upload guidance shows that matching audio and metadata can cause tracks to be linked in some legitimate re-delivery cases, but it does not describe a royalty-diversion mechanism.[3]

So we treat royalty hijacking through duplicate uploads as a theory to test case by case. It hasn't been shown to be widespread.

Where things can go wrong

A recording passes from the distributor to the platform, onto an artist profile and into rights administration. Each stage relies on identifiers and metadata. DDEX guidance shows that recording ownership is represented through specific release metadata, including the phonogram copyright notice.[4]

An investigation should therefore compare the audio, ISRC history, ownership notices, distributor delivery records, artist mapping, release dates and payment reports. A mismatch is a question. It is not proof of intent.

Controls a rightsholder can apply

  • Keep the original delivery record and distributor acknowledgement.
  • Monitor unexpected releases and profile attachments.
  • Record ISRC, audio fingerprint, ownership notice and release history together.
  • Use the platform's official reporting route for an unauthorised upload.
  • Preserve screenshots, URLs, timestamps and responses before a listing changes.
  • Do not allege diversion until payment and delivery evidence supports it.

So our conclusion is narrow. Recording identity can be abused, and public platform controls acknowledge the risk. Gather evidence before saying what it cost anyone.

Sources

Primary and official sources.

  1. Introducing artist profile protection
    Spotify for Artists · official platform · Published 15 March 2026 · Accessed 10 August 2026
    Supports: Spotify documents malicious release attachment and metadata mix-ups affecting artist profiles.
  2. Reporting music uploaded without your permission
    Spotify for Artists Support · official platform · Accessed 10 August 2026
    Supports: Spotify provides a process for rightsholders to report music uploaded without permission.
  3. Re-uploading music
    Spotify for Artists Support · official platform · Accessed 10 August 2026
    Supports: Spotify may link re-uploaded tracks when audio and metadata match, preserving play counts in qualifying cases.
  4. PLine and CLine
    DDEX · industry standard · Accessed 10 August 2026
    Supports: DDEX guidance explains how sound-recording ownership information is expressed through the phonogram copyright notice.
Read next

See Royalty Investigator

Royalty Investigator checks delivery records, ISRC history and ownership notices against each other, the same evidence trail this piece sets out for spotting an unauthorised upload.